How much are people using the GML I/O classes currently in JTS? My
impression is that projects which have developed full-blown GML I/O APIs
have developed their own JTS converters which fit in more smoothly with
their GML implementations. (Eg. GeoTools)
But if there's a bit demand perhaps there could be some funding
available as well?
Rushforth, Peter wrote:
Hi Farrukh and Martin,
I second the need for a GML 3 reader / writer, and I would
help out if I could. I think GML 2 is nice but the coordinate
model is just text whereas the list of doubles of posList seems
to be better future-proofing.
Cheers,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Farrukh Najmi
Sent: May 12, 2008 17:20
To: JTS Topology Suite Development
Subject: Re: [jts-devel] jtsio and GML3
Hi Martin,
I understand the need for funded development as I have a
small company that works on similar model.
Unfortunately I do not have the ability fund the proposed feature.
Would you be interested in doing this work without funding in
exchange for my providing a solid GML 3 Reader and Writer?
What do you think? Thanks.
Martin Davis wrote:
We left room for a gml3 package for parsing GML3 geometry.
I suppose
other options would be to have a single class which could be
parameterized to say whether to read GML2 or GML3, or have
the parser
auto-detect the version.
We'd be happy to work on this if there was funding available.
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
