Michael Michaud wrote:
Fine, I'll change my PlainIntersects by InteriorsIntersect).
NB : are interiorIntersects and interiorsIntersect topologically
equivalent, or maybe interiorIntersects should accept interior of A
intersects boundary of B while InteriorsIntersect shouldn't :-\
Michael, I'd be hesitant to attach different semantics to names which
are so easily confused. If you think there's a need for a relation
which takes the boundary into account, I would recommend that we come up
with a more descriptive name. Otherwise, just go with
InteriorsIntersect to provide the straightforward "T********" semantics.
--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
