I have 9.3, but I am no arcmap wizard.  If you can give me step-by-step
instructions I can tell you what happens and/or attach screen shots.

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No one has mentioned that the new ArcGIS 9.3 will create Geodesic buffers
> if:
>
> "Features to be buffered are points or multipoints.
> Input features are in geographic coordinates.
> Buffer distance is in Euclidian linear units."
>
> "Output buffer polygons will take into account that longitudinal distance
> varies with latitude."
>
> Taken from the summer issue of ArcUSER:
> http://esri.com/news/arcuser/1008/files/top10gp.pdf
>
> I don't have 9.3 yet so I can't try this.  Has anyone else?  I guess the
> fact that ESRI limits the input to points says that they haven't really
> solved this problem either.
>
> regards,
> Larry Becker
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Michael Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>>  Hum... consider two lines that do barely touch. You have an intersection
>>> point. If the transformation changes the intersection points, it would
>>> mean that it's possible that after reprojection the two lines do
>>> not touch anymore, thereby changing their topological relationship.
>>>
>>> I have vague memories of continuous transformations never altering
>>> the topological relationships between the transformed geometries,
>>> but I may have dreamt about it :)
>>>
>> I think it may be true with shapes which are not discretized. But we
>> always use a discrete representation and we generally suppose that
>> coordinates can be linearly  interpolated between points. But interpolation
>> function should not be the same in geodetic space and in projected space
>> (the precise image of a straight segment - or a geodetic line -  on Earth's
>> surface is generally not a straight segment in the projected plan). The
>> error is hidden as far as we do not need to interpolate, but can appear as
>> soon as we need to interpolate (as in intersection computation for example).
>>
>> Michaƫl
>>
>>  Cheers
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jts-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> jts-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel

Reply via email to