2009/1/29 Martin Davis <[email protected]>: > Hmmm... Not sure I like the idea of this going into Envelope, when it could > easily be placed in an external utility class. I think it's a good idea to > keep the signature of Envelope as narrow as possible, to reduce the possible > of awkward dependencies going forward. >
I'd vote for that approach too. Michael _______________________________________________ jts-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
