Cool - I'll add this for ver 1.11
John Cartwright wrote:
I like that suggestion even better!
--john
Martin Davis wrote:
Good point, Ken.
Maybe even better would be toWKT() and toWKB() methods - that would
be very explicit about what is being returned.
Ken Tanaka wrote:
I think that it's reasonable that the methods toString and toText
are the same, but the toString output shouldn't be relied on for WKT
representations--typically toString contains whatever the author of
the API feels is useful to know about the object and its format may
change in future implementations unless the JavaDoc defines and
commits to maintain a given format into the future. The toText is
expected conform to the WKT format
-Ken
John Cartwright wrote:
Hello All,
I'm just looking for a little clarification on converting a
Geometry to it's WKT representation. It looks to me like
Geometry#toString and Geometry#toText produce the same result. Is
there any reason to use one over the other? Given both these
return the WKT, why would one choose to use the WKTWriter#write
method?
Thanks!
--john
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
--
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022
_______________________________________________
jts-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jts-devel
