RE: Sun's WSDP Registry...

[Steve Viens]

Thanks Geir, I'll apply the patch as soon as it's posted.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:46 PM
To: juddi-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sun's WSDP Registry...


Yep that was it.

Makes Sun's Registry happy.  Fixed the businessKey problem w/ IBM but  
now IBM has other issues... I'll chase down and submit a patch...

geir

On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> blew it's cookies when I ran the SaveBusinessSample.  It gave me an
> auth token, but then to my amazement threw an NPE w/ the save business

> request :
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";><SOAP-ENV: 
> Header/><SOAP-ENV:Body><SOAP-ENV:Fault><detail><dispositionReport  
> generic="2.0" operator="Sun Microsystems Inc." truncated="false"  
> xmlns="urn:uddi-org:api_v2"><result errno="10500"><errInfo  
> errCode="E_FATALERROR">java.lang.NullPointerException
>       at  
> com.sun.registry_server.base.UDDIString.&lt;init&gt;(UDDIString.java: 
> 89)
>       at
com.sun.registry_server.base.UDDIKey.&lt;init&gt;(UDDIKey.java:92)
>       at  
> com.sun.registry_server.base.BusinessKey.&lt;init&gt; 
> (BusinessKey.java:72)
>       at  
> com.sun.registry_server.base.BusinessEntity.&lt;init&gt; 
> (BusinessEntity.java:106)
>       at  
>
com.sun.registry_server.base.BusinessEntities.newObject(BusinessEntitie 
> s.java:55)
>       at  
>
com.sun.registry_server.base.UDDICollection.populate(UDDICollection.jav 
> a:77)
>       at  
> com.sun.registry_server.base.BusinessEntities.&lt;init&gt; 
> (BusinessEntities.java:40)
>       at  
> com.sun.registry_server.request.SaveBusiness.&lt;init&gt; 
> (SaveBusiness.java:60)
>
>
> It did have the courtesy to return the entire stack trace in the  
> result message....
>
> Now, putting aside the fact that this is v1.5 of this gawdawful  
> software, and it should do some thing much more intelligent that barf

> an NPE back at me, it is hinting that maybe there's something wrong w/

> the BusinessKey :), similar to what IBM said...  I'm going to set it  
> as "" and see if businessKey gets included as an attribute...
>
>
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]