As long as it's pluggable (use XMLBeans OR jUDDI), Am ok. thanks, dims
On 8/12/05, Guillaume Sauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys > > We want to integrate Scout in JOnAS as a replacement for the JAXR > Reference Implementation. > With Scout we can get ride of JAXB-RI too (used by JAXR-RI) and use OSS :) > > Scout has been very easily embed in JOnAS as a ResourceAdapter and seems > to work very well, thanks to your hard work: ) > > We can see that Scout depends on jUDDI, and jUDDI depends on many > jakarta commons libs. > > Given the JOnAS ClassLoader architecture, the Scout RA (and all > depending libs : scout, juddi, common-*, ...) will be loaded in a > 'commons' ClassLoader, this is a top level Loader. > > So, if a user package his/her application/webapp with a lib already > provided by JOnAS (version can differ) there can be a conflict! > > More, if a user want to change the jUDDI (webapp) version, he can't do > that (classes in top level loader are always loaded first) ! > > As we want to interfere a minimum with the classes packaged in our > user's application, in order to avoid conflicts, we want to remove the > dependency on jUDDI. > > To do this, we will have to rewrite some kind of RegistryProxy, avoid > the use of jUDDI's handlers and datatypes, ... > We thought to use xmlbeans as a replacement for UDDI datatypes > > I want to know what do you think of this proposal ? > I think it can be useful for geronimo guys too (and for the same > classloader reasons). > > Regards > Guillaume > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
