I think I'd prefer RegistryException (or Exception) so there's not compile time dependency on JAXR.
Steve On 1/4/07, Kurt T Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scout should be able to connect to more then juddi.. Anil Saldhana wrote: Why not the RegistryException from juddi? I do not think it is wise to have juddi being dependent on jaxr api. The others can comment on it. *Kurt T Stam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote: I just checked in code for JUDDI-90, embedded mode execution, and I have a question: Right now the classes in the org.apache.juddi.registry.local package throws a javax.xml.registry.RegistryException, which means that I added a dependency on the jaxr-api.jar (which I obtained from scout). In itself it seems like the right type of exception, but is everyone ok with adding the dependency to jaxr? I could simply be changed to 'Exception', and the jaxr dependency would go away. --Kurt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
