Hi guys,

I'm halfway into removing all the *Id.java classes from the persistence layer on the UDDI v3 branch, and it is making it all a lot cleaner. The reason they are there is b/c the way the PKs are setup in the UDDI v2 schema. They are composite PK, however we can simplify the PKs to be of type Long.

Does anyone see any issues with this? Where we planning on using the parents business keys for fast searching or something? Are we afraid of running out of 'integers' in the ID columns?

Speak up or hold your peace forever ;).

--Kurt

Reply via email to