> Daß Lazarus als Individuum auferweckt wird, ist unbedeutend, vielleicht
> auch ärgerlich. .../...
> Nebensächlich bleibt dabei die Frage, ob jene Erwekkung auch
> stattgefunden hat.
Notes
Is it totally clear ? Nowadays, from 500 days of year 2000, there are
evidences that the resurrection of Lazare is a myth. Same for the
ascension, the assumption, immaculate conception, shroud of Torino etc.
The supposed reality of the R is not minor, it's simply not. The
interest is, as EJ says, the powerfull of the myth.
This remark because there is a mix of several notions (if considered
#16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) : the myths, the path of life, science
of physics. The myth is typically a sort of propaganda which mobilizes
human brain.
Wait for translation of #19 for more about physics.
Greetings
richard
