It would be easier to have three (or up to 5) independent colors/players. And perhaps we should incorporate the Walgaenger figure into the anarch. The anarch suits me fine - in the disguise of an influential businessman.
Are we living in current times? Are current world events to be part of the drama? Your idea, proceed.... Thomas -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: February 13, 1999 2:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: The game About the game: The chess game was parallel to the political game. Its to say: I will design - with your help- the characters in a city: i.e. Vancouver. Then we will put them in action- let me a few days to design the scenary - the city, characters, political situation of the city, etc -, and to create the event - perhaps a terrorist action - which will serve as detonator - in a W.S. style - of the game. Each of the players will take the role of a character - or someones if we are only three. Each player should try best, in short: keep alive, keep free, make his work, try to act according his "characteristics". Each movement into the political scenary is accompanied by a movement in the chess game. I think we agree THE WORKER is the fiercest figure. To me- as Homeini- is indifferent what character I have to play - of course the anarch and waldwanger are more charming but which is important is the game, l´art pour l´art. If we finally are only three I could play the Worker - and its variants: vancouver political powers, entrepeneurs-bourgoise, massmedia chiefs, chief of police, etc... and white pieces and Ricardo and you could play anarch, waldwangers - and its variants...; and black pieces - you would have to discuss the chess movements between you two. Allora? Va bene cosi? greetings roberto
