#32

Text:

Aus einer Familienchronik: Anna Determann wurde geboren am 27. September
1812. Aus ihrer Jugendzeit erzählte ihre Tochter Hermine folgendes:

»Als Mädchen von zwölf Jahren steht die Mutter einmal in Ueffeln, wo ihr
Vater Kantor war, vor der Haustür und sieht über den Kirchhof einen
Leichenzug gehen. Voran ihr Vater mit den Schulkindern, dann eine
Kindsleiche und einige Männer und Frauen als Gefolge. Der Zug kommtnicht
durch das Tor des Kirchhofes ihrem Hause gegenüber, durch das alle
Leichen getragen werden, sondern durch das Tor an der anderen Ecke, das
nur für die Kirchgänger bestimmt ist.

Da meine Mutter ihren Vater in der Wohnstube weiß, erschrickt sie heftig
und schreit: >Vater, Vater!< Der kommt aus der Stube, und da erzählt sie
ihm, was sie gesehen. Er will es ihr ausreden und sagt: >Sieh mal, Kind,
schon deshalb kannst du es nicht gesehen haben, weil durch dieses Tor
niemals eine Leiche getragen wird.<

Einige Tage später stirbt das Kind eines Heuermanns, und in der Nacht
vor der Beerdigung stürzt das Tor ein, durch welches alle Leichen
getragen werden. Das Kind muß durch das andere Tor getragen
werden—gerade so, wie meine Mutter es gesehen hat.«

Translation:

 From a family chronicle:  Anna Determann was born on 27 September 1812.
 From the time of her youth her mother Hermine told her daughter the
 following story:

"As a girl of twelve my mother once stood in front of her house
in Ueffeln, where her father was Cantor, and saw a funeral
procession passing over the churchyard.  At the head her father
with the schoolchildren, then the body of a child and several
men and women in train.  The procession comes not through
the churchyard gate opposite her house, through which all bodies
are carried, but through the gate at the other end, which is
designated only for churchgoers.

"Since my mother knew her father in the living room, she took
great fright and screamed:  'Father, Father!'  He comes out of
the room, and then she tells him what she saw.  He wants to talk
her out of it and says:  'See here, child, you can't have really
seen it, because no body is ever carried through this gate."

Several days later the child of a hired hand dies, and in the
night before the interment the gate through which all the bodies
are carried breaks down.  The child must be carried through the
other gate--exactly as my mother had seen."

Comments:

Now we have a vision not only with details, but with one
detail contrary to previous practice, and yet this vision too
comes to pass.  It's as if the Scotsman saw a trout swimming
next to his brother in a pond that never had trout, but before
the vision became real a stream with trout was diverted to the
pond.

The point that EJ seems to be making is that a true vision
actually does predict the future:  it sees things before they
happen.  This could mean a lot of things, but I will suggest
just one:  powerful intuition.

It so happens that I "foresaw" the Challenger disaster of
January 1986.  On the night before it happened, I was preparing
supper with the television on in the next room.  The announcer
was saying that a group of schoolchildren had come from Japan,
I think, to see the lift-off and the teachers hoped that they
would not be disappointed by a postponement due to rain.  I
said--out loud, for some reason--that they were going to be more
disappointed when the spaceship exploded.  I had a momentary
flash of the event in my mind and a momentary urge to warn
somebody, but then laughed it off and finished making my supper. 
When the next morning the engineer called in from the other room
(I work at a radio station), it took me a moment to remember my
"vision."  He was horrified and was jumping up and down while
they showed the re-runs.  I was not surprised at all and only
smiled gloomily, which made him wonder.

So then, am I a seer?  Not at all.  In the preceding week at the
radio station I had handled the news, which included daily items
about weather and problems with the Challenger.  There had been
four postponements, and NASA clearly wanted to get the shuttle
off of the ground.  It was not hard to foresee a disaster on the
way, but hard consciously to accept it.  My unconscious mind had
no such hesitation and made the bizarre manifestation of
speaking the warning out loud.  The "vision" was just my
imagination.

Similarly, I think, the Scotsman in #31 might have feared that his
missing brother had gone a-wandering in the bogs; his unconscious mind
presented him with a likely picture, complete with trout detail.  The
mother in #32, though a little girl, may have seen that gate crumbling
in the same week that she saw that little workman's boy coughing so
hard.  Her unconscious mind might have worried, "How will he be buried
if he can't go through that gate?"  We need to know more before we can
credit the two with some kind of supernatural vision.

There is another factor:  There may be a tendency, after the
vision becomes reality, for the seer to recast the original
vision to make it conform more exactly with what actually took
place.

And a final factor:  The seer may have many other visions that
prove to be wrong, so that the one that proves right begins to
look like a coincidence:  reality confirmed one of the many
potential futures envisioned by the unconscious mind.

I had another bold vision besides the one about the Challenger.  It
was that Robert Kennedy was going to declare himself a candidate for
President against Lyndon Johnson, and he was going to win.  When
he was shot in 1968, I remembered my vision and said to myself:  "Well,
I knew something important was going to happen about him."

If I told you all of my premonitions, you would think I was blind and
had no powers at all.  But if I told you only about the Challenger you
would think I was as clairvoyant as that little girl.

Question:  Is Heuermann a hired hand or a haymaker?

Antwort per Email an