Re: [jug-discussion] open laslo

[Art Gramlich]

Actually, I'd say sun is endoring jruby more since they have hired the two main developers to work on it. Kinda funny since Groovy seems like a better java integration choice. Now if they would just fix the major bugs and get a 1.0 out.

On Nov 9, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Warner Onstine wrote:

On Nov 9, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Chad Woolley wrote:

Why groovy vs. Jruby, other than the fact that Sun is endorsing
Groovy?  We all know that Sun only endorses usable and technically
viable solutions (like J2EE).

-warner

Not necessarily groovy vs. anything, I want to learn alot of different techs and I have a specific project in mind for groovy ;-).

OpenLazlo looks pretty cool, especially if it compiles to DHTML.
Haven't used it myself.

-- Chad

On 11/9/06, Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I would very much like to, but that project hasn't bubbled up to the
top yet, next on my list is groovy ;-).

-warner

On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Randolph Kahle wrote:

> Is anyone using or thinking about using open laslo?
>
> -- Randy
>
>
>

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>
>



To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -------------------------------------------------------------------- - > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jug.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- -

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature