Anyone want to hear about my experience combining Grails + JSON + GWT? It's
been "interesting".
-Travis
"All true benefits are mutual."


On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Duffy Gillman <du...@gillman.net> wrote:

> I like the Flex data binding and the hack meeting ideas.
>
> My $.02
>
> -D
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2009, at 11:40 PM, William H. Mitchell wrote:
>
>  July came and went without a peep about a JUG meeting but maybe we can do
>> better in August and September.
>>
>> Andy Barton's recently migrated from Eclipse to IntelliJ and he says he'd
>> be willing to share his experiences with that on September 8.  That sounds
>> great to me.
>>
>> Does anybody have any ideas for the August 11 meeting?
>>
>> I could recycle an old Developer's SIG presentation on the functional
>> language ML that's based on lecture slides I've used when teaching ML at UA.
>>  There's no direct connection to Java but if you're curious about functional
>> programming ML is a good vehicle for seeing the concepts.  (Haskell is
>> better but I don't have any slides on it!)
>>
>> Also, I've been digging into the data binding machinery in Adobe Flex
>> recently and could perhaps get together something interesting that talks
>> about the idea and implementation of data binding in Flex.
>>
>> A third idea for August is one I've mentioned before: a hack night where
>> we show up with our laptops, quickly identify some open source thing or REST
>> interface to fiddle with, and see if we can do something interesting with it
>> before the beer beckons.  (Not for those who like a well-structured
>> meeting.)
>>
>> Other thoughts?
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jug-discussion-unsubscr...@tucson-jug.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: jug-discussion-h...@tucson-jug.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jug-discussion-unsubscr...@tucson-jug.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jug-discussion-h...@tucson-jug.org
>
>

Reply via email to