Yes, actually.  Particularly where you found the documentation
unenlightening.  I wish to see it improve.

On 10/17/03 11:28 AM, "Jason Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks Andy.  I finally figured out that it was actually an issue with
> Velocity, not my setup.  It works great now!  If anybody is interested in
> setting up a similar environment, I would be glad to share some of my notes.
> 
> Jason
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Behalf Of Andrew C. Oliver
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:47 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [Juglist] Apache 2.0 + mod_jk2 + tomcat/jboss bundle
>> 
>> 
>> Really?  I found the coverage of this in the clustering
>> documentation pretty
>> good.  I'm betting your worker pool size/treads setting isn't right.  Post
>> to jboss-users...with your config info.
>> 
>> -Andy
>> 
>> On 10/15/03 5:15 PM, "Jason Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> I am wondering if anybody here has had success deploying Apache 2.0
>>> connected to the Jboss/Tomcat bundle using mod_jk2.  I've gotten it to
>>> 'sorta' work.  It appears to work fine until you give it a little bit of
>>> a load (like only 5 or 10 concurrent users) and you begin seeing broken
>>> pipe exceptions and such.
>>> 
>>> There seems to be little documentation for jk2 and the tomcat bundle.
>>> I've purchased the jboss docos but they provide little insight into
>>> getting this working properly.
>>> 
>>> The exact versions I'm using are:
>>> 
>>> Apache 2.0.47
>>> Jboss 3.2.1 with tomcat 4.1.24
>>> jk2 2.0.2
>>> Linux 2.4.20 (RH 9)
>>> 
>>> I've had no problem getting it to work as standalone components (i.e. no
>>> bundle).  For this setup, I had Apache 2.0.47, TC 4.1.18, Jboss 3.2.1
>>> and mod_jk (NOT jk2) 1.2.5.
>>> 
>>> What versions/setups are people normally using in production
>>> environments?
>>> 
>>> Any comments on the jk and jk2 connectors for use in production
>>> environments?  Seems to be little documentation for something that seems
>>> so critical.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the help.
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Juglist mailing list
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
>> 
>> --
>> Andrew C. Oliver
>> http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
>> Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
>> 
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
>> For Java and Excel, Got POI?
>> 
>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost
>> definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its
>> general membership.  In fact they probably most definitively disagree with
>> everything espoused in the above email.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Juglist mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Juglist mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org

-- 
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI

http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost
definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its
general membership.  In fact they probably most definitively disagree with
everything espoused in the above email.


_______________________________________________
Juglist mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org

Reply via email to