There is also the JMS Appender among others. The JDK logging is not one of the most well considered things. Not just because I like open source, I happen to like the JDK regex support. I don't particularly like log4j except for everything else out there.
One caution is the commons logging thing. Avoid that like the plague. It doesn't do what it tries to do and has some nasty side effects. (like further coupling you to particular versions of log4j to which it must be compiled with, coupling you to a particular classloader scheme) -Andy > From: Don Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing > list."<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:56:33 -0400 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Juglist] Logging in Struts w/ Tomcat 5 > > At 10:07 PM 6/25/2004, you wrote: >> Don Brady wrote: >> >>> Yes, I know that it does not have every last feature in log4j but it has >>> enough in my opinion. >> >> Does JDK logging have the ability to configure the different types >> of Appenders, like Log4J? That is, is there something roughly synonomous >> to SMTPAppender, so I can configure certain message to >> be e-mailed somewhere, etc? >> >> If not, I for one, could not justify moving to JDK logging.... >> SMTPAppender gives us a capability that we find very valuable. >> >> OTOH, if JDK Logging has something similar, maybe it's time to >> give it a look... > > It does not. > > > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org _______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
