(english / deutsch / italiano)

Continuano le fake news della RAI sulla Siria

1) Double Standards (GFP 27.2.2018)
2) Curdi e siriani ad Afrin: «Siamo una cosa sola» (N. Brauns / jW, 22.2.2018)


Sul tema della disinformazione strategica mirata allo squartamento dello Stato 
siriano si veda anche il video-editoriale di Mario Albanesi:
IL PIANO ELETTORALE (23 feb 2018) – Se l'esito della consultazione elettorale 
consentirà ad una forza politica di governare, uno dei principali compiti sarà 
quello di limitare lo strapotere disinformativo delle reti televisive, in 
particolare di quelle Rai...
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMoA2lMJjaQ


=== 1 ===

ORIG.: Doppelte Standards (GFP 26.2.2018)
Mit verstärktem politischen Druck sucht die Bundesregierung sich im Machtkampf 
um Syrien wieder stärker ins Spiel zu bringen. Im Hinblick auf die furchtbare 
Lage der Zivilbevölkerung in der heftig umkämpften Ost-Ghouta - einem Gebiet im 
Osten von Damaskus, das von einem Al Qaida-Ableger und mehreren mit diesem 
kooperierenden Milizen beherrscht wird - wirft Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel 
Syriens Regierung einen Krieg "nicht gegen Terroristen", sondern gegen die 
"eigene Bevölkerung" vor. Ähnliche Vorwürfe waren bereits während der Schlacht 
zur Rückeroberung Ost-Aleppos laut geworden; ihr fielen laut westlichen Quellen 
beinahe 3.500 Zivilisten zum Opfer. Vergleichbare Vorwürfe gegen die mit 
Beteiligung der Bundeswehr Krieg führende Anti-IS-Koalition sind niemals laut 
geworden; in deren Schlachten zur Rückeroberung Raqqas und Mossuls kamen 
mindestens 1.400 bzw. 9.000 bis 11.000 Zivilisten zu Tode. Doppelte Standards 
sind typisch für Politik und Medien in Kriege involvierter Staaten - vor allem 
dann, wenn diese vor einer politischen Niederlage stehen...
https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/7543/


https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/news/detail/7546/

Double Standards

02/26/2018

DAMASCUS/BERLIN (Own report) - The German government is increasing political 
pressure, in its efforts to have a greater impact in the power struggle over 
Syria. In view of the civilian population's horrible situation in the fiercely 
contested region of East Ghouta, east of Damascus - dominated by an al Qaida 
offshoot and several of its allied militias - Chancellor Merkel is accusing the 
Syrian government of not waging a war "on terrorists" but on "its own people." 
Similar accusations have already been raised during the battle to retake 
Eastern Aleppo, which cost the lives of nearly 3,500 civilians, according to 
western sources. No such accusations, however, were raised against the anti-IS 
war coalition - with German Bundeswehr participation - when at least 1,400, and 
from 9000 - 11,000 civilians were killed in their battles to retake Raqqa and 
Mosul respectively. Double standards are typical for politicians and media in 
countries involved in war, particularly when they face defeat.

Battle for East Ghouta

The German government is again attempting to have a greater impact on the power 
struggle over Syria, in view of the battles to take control of the region of 
East Ghouta, east and northeast of Damascus - with a current population of 
400,000 according to UN estimates. The region is one of the so-called 
de-escalation zones agreed to by Russia, Iran and Turkey in the Astana talks 
last year. Attempts to salvage the de-escalation and prevent a new flare-up of 
the war in East Ghouta had been thwarted by Salafist jihadi militia on 
November, 14, 2017. Following a series of minor skirmishes, they launched 
attacks on government troop positions in Harasta, a town near the border of the 
Salafist-controlled region. The battles have not calmed since. The East Ghouta 
Salafist jihadi militias have begun to arbitrarily launch rockets into 
residential areas of Damascus, killing dozens of civilians. These attacks 
target particularly residential districts with Christian populations, 
apparently to spread fear and panic among non-Muslims.[1]

A Repressive Regime

In view of the ongoing shelling of residential areas of Damascus, the Syrian 
government has recently launched a military offensive to retake East Ghouta, 
once and for all. The four militias in control of the area include Hayat Tahrir 
al Sham directly allied with al Qaida and Ahrar al Sham, which has been 
cooperating with al Qaida for several years and has been explicitly classified 
by the German judiciary as a terrorist organization.[2] A third militia, Failaq 
al Rahman, has officially disassociated itself from al Qaida but, according to 
reports, has concluded a de-facto military alliance with al Qaida's offshoots, 
to have a better standing within the power struggles among East Ghouta's 
various Salafist jihadi militias. Even experts, who adamantly oppose the 
government of Bashar al Assad, admit that the militias in East Ghouta have 
established a repressive regime, enforcing "conservative religious laws" and 
brutally suppressing any opposition. It has been confirmed repeatedly -also by 
Amnesty International - that the militias are preventing civilians from 
fleeing, even arresting people for simply asking permission to leave the war 
zone.[3]

East Aleppo, Mosul, Raqqa, East Ghouta

>From the military point of view, the situation in East Ghouta strongly 
>resembles those in the re-capturing of East Aleppo, (June - December 2016), 
>Mosul (October 2016 - July 2017) and Raqqa (June - October 2017). The combat, 
>including the air raids, are carried out in a densely urbanized area. This is 
>a horrible situation for the civilian population. According to the Atlantic 
>Council - an organization above suspicion of harboring prejudices toward the 
>Assad government or of being pro-Russian - nearly 3,500 civilians were killed 
>during Aleppo's recapture.[4] The battle for Mosul, according to comprehensive 
>research by the Associated Press (AP) news agency - also not under suspicion 
>of being anti-western - at least between 9,000 and 11,000 civilians were 
>killed. AP has proof that at least 3,200 had been killed directly by the 
>US-led anti-IS coalition attacks; another two-thirds were killed by the IS, 
>and one-third had been caught in crossfire, so it is unclear, who had actually 
>fired the fatal shots.[5] It can be assumed that not all of these victims had 
>been killed by IS. Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar al Abadi has admitted to only 
>1,260 civilians killed, whereas the anti-IS coalition admits to a mere 326 
>victims of their attacks.[6] In the battle over Raqqa, according to the 
>organization Airwars - which relies on multiple documented cases and whose 
>claims are occasionally criticized for being too low - at least 1,400 
>civilians had been killed by anti-IS coalition bombing, in the period only 
>between June and October 2017. Of the estimated 2,878 civilians killed 
>throughout that year by anti-IS coalition's air raids, more than 80 percent 
>had been killed in Raqqa.[7]

"Worse than Auschwitz"

Berlin had strongly criticized the battle for East Aleppo and is now condemning 
the battle for East Ghouta. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, for example, has 
accused the governments of Russia, Iran and Syria of responsibility for 
"targeted [!] attacks on civilians and hospitals." "Those crimes must be 
punished."[8] German media, at the time, were referring to "genocide," a "war 
of annihilation" - and even trivializing the Shoah - claiming "Aleppo is worse 
than Auschwitz."[9] Accusations concerning the civilian victims of air raids on 
Mosul and Raqqa were completely absent in western politics and in a large 
segment of western media. If punishment would be demanded for these war crimes, 
the commanders of the Bundeswehr and the German government, itself, would also 
be charged - after all, the German Air Force's reconnaissance flights were 
playing a central role in the bombings carried out by the anti-IS coalition. 
Only now, in reference to the battles for control of East Ghouta, the 
accusation of a "war of annihilation" is again in use.[10] In the Bundestag 
last week, Chancellor Merkel literally alleged that in Syria, "it is not a case 
of a regime combating terrorists, but its own people."[11] Merkel and France's 
President Emmanuel Macron wrote a letter to Russia's President Vladimir Putin - 
which included the allegation that in East Ghouta, the civilian population is 
being submitted "to an unprecedented level of violence." Moscow should 
therefore "talk sense to the Syrian government."[12]

Facing Defeat

Double standards are typical for politicians and the media in countries 
involved in wars, particularly when they face, like Germany, political defeat. 
Since the summer of 2011, Berlin has been banking on the Assad government's 
overthrow. In 2012, in cooperation with representatives of the Syrian 
opposition in exile, it established a road map for Syria's post-war 
reorganization, entitled "The Day After."[13] Within the framework of the 
international "Friends of Syria" alliance, Germany has been participating in 
preparations for the aftermath of Assad's overthrow.[14] In August 2012, the 
German Federal Intelligence Service (BND) bragged of having made an "important 
contribution ... to the overthrow of the Assad regime."[15] The anticipated 
overthrow, however, did not materialize. German hopes received their first 
heavy blow with Russia's intervention in the early fall 2015.[16] The run-up to 
the ultimate defeat came with the battle for Aleppo, when Russia assumed the 
leadership in ceasefire negotiations and a solution to the war.[17] If the 
Syrian government can recapture East Ghouta, it would further consolidate its 
position, whereas the Berlin-supported segment of the (exiled) opposition would 
possibly face ultimate defeat. Berlin's current political offensive against 
Syria is an attempt to turn the tide at the last moment.


[1] Gudrun Harrer: Assads Topgeneral vor den Toren der Ost-Ghouta. 
derstandard.at 21.02.2018. Aron Lund: Understanding Eastern Ghouta in Syria. 
irinnews.org 23.02.2018.

[2] See also Steinmeier und das Oberlandesgericht 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/6881/> and 
Terrorunterstützer <https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/7147/>.

[3] Aron Lund: Understanding Eastern Ghouta in Syria. irinnews.org 23.02.2018.

[4] Atlantic Council: Breaking Aleppo. Washington, February 2017.

[5] Susannah George: Mosul is a graveyard: Final IS battle kills 9,000 
civilians. apnews.com 21.12.2017.

[6] AP: Death toll in Mosul 10 times higher than acknowledged. cbsnews.com 
20.12.2017.

[7] Julian Borger: US air wars under Trump: increasingly indiscriminate, 
increasingly opaque. theguardian.com 23.01.2018.

[8] Dirk Hoeren: Merkel verurteilt Russland und Iran. bild.de 16.12.2016.

[9] See also Die Schlacht um Mossul (IV) 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/7257/>.

[10] Vernichtungskrieg. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 21.02.2018.

[11] Massaker unverzüglich beenden. bundesregierung.de 23.02.2018.

[12] Merkel und Macron schreiben an Putin. bundesregierung.de 25.02.2018.

[13] See also The Day After 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/news/detail/5668/> and The Day After 
(IV) <https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/5693/>.

[14] See also Im Rebellengebiet 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/5705/>.

[15] Christoph Reuter, Raniah Salloum: Das Rätsel des deutschen 
Spionage-Schiffs. spiegel.de 20.08.2012.

[16] See also Consistencies in Western Hegemonic Policy 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/news/detail/6774/>.

[17] See also Aleppo, Mossul und die Hegemonie 
<https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/7173/> and Vom Krisenstaat 
zum Gestalter <https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/news/detail/7238/>.



=== 2 ===

ORIG.: »Wir sind eins« (von Nick Brauns, jW 22.2.2018)
Erdogan zeigt sich von Ankunft syrischer Regierungstruppen unbeeindruckt und 
setzt Angriffe auf Afrin fort...
https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/327809.wir-sind-eins.html?sstr=Acilciler


http://contropiano.org/news/internazionale-news/2018/02/23/curdi-siriani-afrin-siamo-una-cosa-sola-0101152

Curdi e siriani ad Afrin: «Siamo una cosa sola»

di Nick Brauns *
23 febbraio 2018
Erdogan si mostra indifferente rispetto all’arrivo di truppe governative 
siriane e continua gli attacchi contro Afrin.

Dopo un attacco dell’esercito turco contro un convoglio con combattenti di una 
milizia leale al regime di Damasco, nel nord della Siria si delinea un nuovo 
inasprimento della guerra su più fronti. Il convoglio era in viaggio verso il 
cantone autogovernato di Afrin, sotto attacco da parte dell’esercito turco da 
oltre un mese, quando è stato colpito dal fuoco di un drone e dell’artiglieria 
della Turchia. Due miliziani sono rimasti uccisi e altri tre feriti.

Dopo giorni di trattative, le Unità di Difesa del Popolo curde YPG e il governo 
di Damasco martedì hanno raggiunto un patto militare. «Le nostre forze hanno 
chiesto al governo e all’esercito della Siria di assolvere i loro compiti nella 
difesa di Afrin e dei confini», ha dichiarato il portavoce delle YPG Nuri 
Mahmud. «Su questa base il governo siriano ha inviato unità militari nella 
regione. Queste unità verranno posizione sulla linea di confine e difenderanno 
i confini e l’integrità territoriale della Siria». Da parte del governo siriano 
finora non ci sono dichiarazioni ufficiali sull’accordo.

Le truppe siriane inviate a Afrin sono unità delle Forze di Difesa Nazionali 
(NDF). Queste unità di volontari sono state formate nel 2012 da Damasco per il 
sostegno dell’esercito arabo-siriano. Le unità NDF ora arrivate a Afrin, 
provengono dalle città di Nubl e Zahra. Durante un assedio da parte del Fronte 
Al-Nusra, propaggine siriana di Al-Qaeda, durato quasi quattro anni, queste 
enclave sciite erano state rifornite da Afrin attraverso un corridoio tenuto 
aperto dalle YPG. Filmati diffusi attraverso i social network mostrano i 
miliziani dopo il loro arrivo a Afrin città. Insieme a sostenitori delle YPG 
sventolano bandiere dello Stato siriano e i gagliardetti triangolari delle YPG. 
Contemporaneamente risuonano grida di «Siamo una cosa sola».

Il Presidente turco Recep Tayyip Erdogan si è mostrato indifferente rispetto a 
immagini del genere. Le milizie dopo «spari di avvertimento» sarebbero tornate 
indietro, ha sostenuto martedì a Ankara in spregio della verità. L’argomento 
con questo sarebbe «per ora chiuso», ha dichiarato Erdogan secondo il 
quotidiano Zeitung Hürriyet D\aily News. Nel corso di telefonate all’inizio 
della settimana con il Presidente russo Vladimir Putin e il Presidente iraniano 
Hassan Rohani a questo proposito ci sarebbe stato accordo. «Purtroppo alcuni 
gruppi terroristici in solitaria a volte prendono decisioni sbagliate. Questo è 
inaccettabile. Dovranno pagare per questo.» Con questo Erdogan assume la 
posizione che le NDF sarebbero forze irregolari che agiscono senza essersi 
accordate con il governo siriano, ovverosia i suoi alleati russi e iraniani.

Il Presidente turco non sbaglia del tutto. Perché come all’inizio della 
settimana ha riferito il portale di notizie The Region facendo riferimento a 
rappresentanti curdi di Afrin, il governo russo avrebbe cercato di impedire il 
patto militare tra Damasco e Afrin per non mettere in pericolo l’accordo di 
Astana. Lì la Turchia è coinvolta come forza di garanzia per una soluzione 
pacifica in Siria. Per riguardo a Mosca quindi evidentemente il punto decisivo 
della difesa antiaerea è stato tenuto fuori dall’accordo tra Damasco e Afrin. 
Perché un controllo dello spazio aereo tecnicamente sarebbe possibile solo 
attraverso l’esercito ufficiale siriano (SAA) e in accordo con l’esercito 
russo. Dopo che l’artiglieria turca nella notte ha sparato contro il territorio 
della città di Afrin, l’aviazione mercoledì ha di nuovo effettuato attacchi 
aerei contro la città capoluogo di Jindires.

Intanto il capo della milizia «Resistenza Siriana – Fronte Popolare della 
Provincia di Iskenderun», Mihrac Ural, ha dichiarato di andare con un «secondo 
contingente» di truppe governative a Afrin. Come misura di creazione di fiducia 
nei confronti delle YPG, Ural ha pubblicato vecchie foto che lo ritraggono in 
Siria insieme al fondatore del PKK Abdullah Öcalan. Solo la scorsa settimana 
Ankara aveva messo Ural, il segretario dell’organizzazione turca 
marxista-leninista «Acilciler», che dal golpe militare del 1980 vive in Siria, 
sulla lista dei «terroristi» più ricercati e aveva messo sulla sua testa una 
taglia di quattro milioni di Lire turche (ca. 850.000 Euro) per la sua cattura. 
Obiettivo dichiarato di Ural, alevita arabo di Hatay, è la liberazione di 
quella provincia siriana annessa dalla Turchia alla fine degli anni ‘30.

da https://www.jungewelt.de/ <https://www.jungewelt.de/>
Traduzione di Rete Kurdistan




Rispondere a