On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:39 PM, roger peppe <[email protected]> wrote:
The changes look trivial, although we'd have to be careful if we wanted to > maintain backward compatibility. > If we're going to fix this (which ISTM we should) we should make sure we fix the salting at the same time: there's no sense incurring compatibility costs in the same area more than once. A little part of me wants to use this as an excuse to use SSL client certificates for agents instead, but I'm not sure it's really justifiable here. > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
