We'll end up with a command that adds a state server, with a replica of the database and an API server. That's the notion of state server we've been using all along, and sounds quite reasonable, easy to explain and understand.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, roger peppe <roger.pe...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 8 November 2013 12:03, Gustavo Niemeyer <gust...@niemeyer.net> wrote: >> Splitting API and db at some point sounds sensible, but it may be easy and >> convenient to think about a state server as API+db for the time being. > > I'd prefer to start with a command name that implies that possibility; > otherwise we'll end up either with a command that doesn't > describe what it actually does, or more very similar commands > where one could be sufficient. > > Hence my discomfort with "add-state-server" as a command name. -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
