-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14-04-10 02:19 PM, John Meinel wrote: > So Juju would certainly let you run an older binary, and it would, > indeed, switch to that binary.
Phew! > I would be ok with allowing downgrades within a PATCH level, but I > think it still holds true that downgrades are very untested, and > downgrading across a MINOR version is almost definitely always > going to do something bad. Downgrades within a patchlevel are *very* tested, by CI :-) > That said, I think for CI getting bootstrap to target an explicit > version is far better than bootstrapping to the latest trunk, and > then downgrading. +1 > I would be willing to compromise in the short term by adjusting the > "refuse to downgrade" to only refuse to change Major.Minor > versions. It still fixes the existing bug, and would let CI > continue. Thanks. That seems like a good short-term solution. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTRuNGAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hQfwH/1ApaODdPKLYHtihRNsGkpLT fGqp1bf5FGAfQEa+EOipQ6zVRq2eFO/cGFkYMfRE8ifo9EbkS275I0FWfNxZY7K7 L6hfPLcRhWCyjMmAw32pdH6VJD0SwI9F6UBg1ILGODs062ILOAvej6cnmJmSZYJi vW/xoB7Uhif27Zqu/8YPaQZLQQAW8raT46eIeVLRvfzonrdlnmkENZhcsDYVfS07 2Pd0ftXiocUh5S70GtlhTTqkfDYvBnaugjtDKSfZJ9n+uhuyvGSVSoZFOMAEBUPo LXnOWZm8JOO+wzo2zpfB2pSCBYil3O7EJaz9/QODp93ngO0dNQiX0M6H+gbWPmk= =HlFF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
