On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, John Meinel <[email protected]> wrote: > So backup and restore in its original incarnation was just writing down in a > set of scripts what we were performing at the time to make backup/restore > work at a given site. They were a bit hackish to start with. ... > The question is whether it is worth scheduling the time to do it properly, > vs trying to continue patching up the existing work.
I would choose the fastest path to make the test pass. If we have a hack that that passes CI, then we are in a position to revise and replace code without introducing more regressions. My only complaint about juju-backup is that it doesn't except the -e flag like other commands. I can add that myself. -- Curtis Hovey Canonical Cloud Development and Operations http://launchpad.net/~sinzui -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
