I believe the team lead meeting is last night, not tonight. I'm fine with this, AFAIK the only specific change that needs to be made is to get golang-go 1.2.* into ppa:juju/golang. I hope the people (Curtis and Ian) are still planning on configuring the new Jenkins lander as a Precise machine, since I still expect that to be the place where we are the most likely to accidentally break things. (Most developers will be running Trusty, so are likely to catch issues there.) John =:->
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:56 AM, David Cheney <[email protected]>wrote: > William, could you please raise this at the team leads meeting tonight > on my behalf. The steps look quite straight forward, they just need to > go on a card and get done. > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:53 PM, William Reade > <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Andrew Wilkins > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Cheney < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> This is a proposal that we raise the minimum Go spec from Go 1.1 to Go > >>> 1.2. > >>> > >>> Motivation: > >>> > >>> * Now that T is out, we have to support Juju on two series (Precise > >>> and Trusty[1]) with two compilers, gc and gccgo. > >>> * gccgo-4.9, which is version we using in trusty, supports the Go 1.2 > >>> spec > >>> * gc-1.1.2 which is available in a ppa for precise, obviously supports > Go > >>> 1.1 > >>> * gc-1.2.1 is the shipping compiler on Trusty, it supports Go 1.2 > >>> > >>> So now we have three compilers, two versions of gc, and one of gccgo. > >>> > >>> We are in the situation where code written for gccgo under T on ppc64 > >>> or armv8 will not pass the bot running Go 1.1.1. > >>> > >>> For this reason I would like to reduce this matrix. > >>> > >>> Recommendation: > >>> > >>> * Get the trusty compiler into a backport ppa for precise[1] > >>> * Upgrade the bot to use that compiler, raising the minimum compiler > >>> spec to 1.2 across the board > >> > >> > >> SGTM. The bot will be changing soon to a Jenkins lander; seems like an > >> opportune time for making the change. > >> > >>> > >>> Thoughts / Discussion / Spoiled fruit ? > >>> > >>> Dave > >>> > >>> [1] I am ignoring the intermediate, non LTS series', as there are no > >>> charms for them, nor do CTS offer support for them. If this is > >>> unacceptable, anything which applies to Precise wrt. backports, also > >>> applies to Q, R and S. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Juju-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Juju-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > >> > > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >
-- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
