Thanks for updating the bot, Curtis. I think this is definitely an important thing to do.
John =:-> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Nate Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll fix 1342725 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1342725>. > Sorry that one hasn't gotten in earlier. > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Horacio Duran < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Since $$fixes-1342937$$ is already committed I changed the state by hand >> in the bug report sorry I did not do that before, I forgot it was no longer >> automatic. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Magicians. >>> >>> I have updated the rules that test merges to abort when there are ci >>> regressions and the PR doesn't claim to fix one of them >>> >>> Three bugs currently block merges into master. CI is looking for one >>> of these three token: >>> $$fixes-1347715$$ >>> $$fixes-1342725$$ >>> $$fixes-1342937$$ >>> >>> Adding $$fixes-<lp-bug-number>$$ as a comment to the PR will signal it >>> is allowed to test. The token can be in any comment and in any part of >>> the comment. >>> >>> A bug blocks merges when it is of critical importance, in the triaged >>> or in-progress state, and it is tagged with "ci regression". Updating >>> the status of a bug to fix committed will remove it from the list of >>> blockers. >>> >>> It's me, not you, but maybe it should be you. >>> >>> I am spending 4 out of 5 days reviewing all the broken test runs >>> looking for new evidence to help close the regressions. The >>> regressions are mutating. As I am the only person on operations duties >>> this week because of vacations, I cannot keep up. Juju developers must >>> stop landing branches that compound the regressions. >>> >>> As devel has been broken since 2014-06-25, and devel was broken for >>> many weeks in June. it is fair to say juju devel has not worked for a >>> month and only 2 weeks in the last 2 months. There is little point in >>> adding features to devel because I cannot release an alpha with >>> regressions. >>> >>> I hope with a working devel, or at least a slower moving broken devel, >>> the Juju QA Team can write new tests that ensure new juju is >>> compatible with old juju so that Ubuntu will it in trusty. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Curtis Hovey >>> Canonical Cloud Development and Operations >>> http://launchpad.net/~sinzui >>> >>> -- >>> Juju-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >>> >> >> >> -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >> >> > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > >
-- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
