nah, we have a fix upstream, we just need to get that backported to trusty then this becomes a non issue.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Matthew Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > As it's something we need to be doing for a while yet is there value in > adding this as a task that gets run by the landing bot? > > Thanks > > Matty > > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Tim Penhey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I spent some time this morning looking at >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1362636 >> >> A critical regression that was breaking CI on power. >> >> There is a bug in gccgo where we hit an internal compiler error when >> comparing an interface to a concrete type that implements the interface >> (as opposed to a pointer to the concrete type implementing the interface). >> >> This impacts some of the names.Tag rework that is going on. >> >> If you try to compare: >> var tag names.Tag = names.NewMachineTag("1") >> >> if names.NewUnitTag("1") == tag { >> // BOOM!!! >> } >> >> This is entirely valid Go, and works fine with gc, but gccgo barfs >> horribly. >> >> My fix is here: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/633 >> >> This is just a warning. >> >> Remember folks that we need to support gccgo still (for at least another >> year until we have power and arm64 using gc). >> >> You can test locally by doing this: >> go test -compiler gccgo >> >> If you install the gccgo packages, which I don't remember, but hopefully >> someone will follow up with. >> >> Cheers, >> Tim >> >> -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
