one of the issues with having it in tree, means client usage falls under
the AGPL. We want to have the client used widely under a more permissive
license. I've already had contributions to other projects n'acked due to
license on our libraries. I'd like to see it moved to a separate repo so
that's possible. Thoughts?

cheers,
Kapil
-- 
Juju-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Reply via email to