When I was new to juju myself, we only had one State, I believe. That one golden state was supposed to represent the state of the whole deployment, so it was indeed The State of the system. Having tons of these indeed sounds awkward.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Michael Foord <michael.fo...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 12/03/15 05:01, David Cheney wrote: >> >> lucky(~/src/github.com/juju/juju) % pt -i type\ State\ | wc -l >> >> 23 >> >> Thank you. > > > When I was new to Juju the fact that we had a central "State", core to the > Juju model, but we had umpteen types called State - so where you saw a State > you had no idea what it actually was and when someone mentioned State you > couldn't be sure what they meant - was a significant part of the learning > curve. > > Perhaps a better solution would have been a better name for the core State. > > Michael > > >> >> Dave >> > > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
