On 6 May 2015 at 19:53, Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 6 May 2015 at 04:57, Menno Smits <menno.sm...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > It is more likely that Juju will grow the ability to send logs to > external > > log services using the syslog protocol (and perhaps others). You could > use > > this to log to your own log aggregator or database. This feature has been > > discussed but hasn't been planned in any detail yet (pull requests would > be > > most welcome!). > > syslog seems a bad fit, as the logs are now structured data and I'd > like to keep it that way. I guess people want it as an option, but I'd > consider it the legacy option here. > You're right. Structured logs would be much more useful. > My own use case would be to make a more readable debug-logs, rather > than attempting to parse the debug-logs output ;) Hmm... I may be able > to do this already via the Juju API. > Not yet. The API used by debug-log currently emits formatted log lines, not structured log data.
-- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
