-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22.05.2015 08:26, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a small announcement, in case anyone cares. In the EC2 > provider, from 1.24, we will start tagging instances and volumes > with their Juju-internal names and the Juju environment UUID. > Instances, for example, will have a name of "machine-0", > "machine-1", etc., corresponding to the ID in "juju status". There > is not currently an upgrade step to tag existing resources, so only > newly created resources will be tagged. > > The environment UUID can be used to identify all instances and > volumes that are part of an environment. This could be used to for > billing purposes; to charge the infrastructure costs for a Juju > environment to a particular user/organisation. > > We will be looking at doing the same for OpenStack for 1.24 also. > > Cheers, Andrew > > I assume we won't tag instances with a Name tag if there already is one, right? Otherwise it's a bad UX.
For OpenStack, we should use instance names the same way (and only if the name is not already set), as tags not supported widely yet. - -- Dimiter Naydenov <[email protected]> Juju Core Sapphire team <http://juju.ubuntu.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVXt8jAAoJENzxV2TbLzHwq1wIAIRxgZ8Y7mXq31nZsdnoDtmi buXTt65vABccPaIsbfOHzgvrFl+cAwGx77Sh38uUosxoopXou5LkRb9tz2bHr8XD JbMY4A15E1usuKSfjxNR3YdsqbliosUCI8kgXDhwMtPFVucKxtwgIgNqfDsn8u9K 9C9xHFZaLpMP/67a801HjpJ2Gcl8Kg0Abl0mcAvTp/honlQCMnQV+xI4WG0xeAdO rlnPJwX7RWRRM6BpxOtni96iZLfwdklfzuAgUIhCWy5p4XWM/SLhDGBGCRaHqlHZ xQsbfQi0TzWObnFwmNTbTZ7vXl3Lsh4HRynwNEcRwXHCRIlNmWDUmo6zLMIVdEY= =bAoi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
