Totally belongs on the wiki. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:45 AM, John Meinel <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is one of those things that should probably end up on the Wiki. > Thanks for writing it up. > > John > =:-> > > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:34 PM, William Reade < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I've noticed that there's a lot of confusion over how to write a useful >> worker. Here follow some guidelines that you should be *very* certain of >> yourself before breaking (and probably talk to me about anyway). If there's >> any uncertainty about these, I'm more than happy to expand. >> >> * If you really just want to run a dumb function on its own goroutine, >> use worker.NewSimpleWorker. >> >> * If you just want to do something every <period>, use >> worker.NewPeriodicWorker. >> >> * If you want to react to watcher events, you should probably use >> worker.NewNotifyWorker or worker.NewStringsWorker. >> >> * If your worker has any methods outside the Worker interface, DO NOT >> use any of the above callback-style workers. Those methods, that need to >> communicate with the main goroutine, *need* to know that goroutine's state, >> so that they don't just hang forever. >> >> * To restate the previous point: basically *never* do a naked channel >> send/receive. If you're building a structure that makes you think you need >> them, you're most likely building the wrong structure. >> >> * If you're writing a custom worker, and not using a tomb.Tomb, you are >> almost certainly doing it wrong. Read the blog post [0] or, hell, just read >> the code [1] -- it's less than 200 lines and it's about 50% comments. >> >> * If you're letting tomb.ErrDying leak out of your workers to any >> clients, you are definitely doing it wrong -- you risk stopping another >> worker with that same error, which will quite rightly panic (because that >> tomb is *not* yet dying). >> >> * If it's possible for your worker to call .tomb.Done() more than once, >> or less than once, you are *definitely* doing it very very wrong indeed. >> >> * If you're using .tomb.Dead(), you are very probably doing it wrong -- >> the only reason (that I'm aware of) to select on that .Dead() rather than >> on .Dying() is to leak inappropriate information to your clients. They >> don't care if you're dying or dead; they care only that the component is no >> longer functioning reliably and cannot fulfil their requests. Full stop. >> Whatever started the component needs to know why it failed, but that parent >> is usually not the same entity as the client that's calling methods. >> >> * If you're using worker/singular, you are quite likely to be doing it >> wrong, because you've written a worker that breaks when distributed. Things >> like provisioner and firewaller only work that way because we weren't smart >> enough to write them better; but you should generally be writing workers >> that collaborate correctly with themselves, and eschewing the temptation to >> depend on the funky layer-breaking of singular. >> >> * If you're passing a *state.State into your worker, you are almost >> certainly doing it wrong. The layers go worker->apiserver->state, and any >> attempt to skip past the apiserver layer should be viewed with *extreme* >> suspicion. >> >> * Don't try to make a worker into a singleton (this isn't particularly >> related to workers, really, singleton is enough of an antipattern on its >> own [2] [3] [4]). Singletons are basically the same as global variables, >> except even worse, and if you try to make them responsible for goroutines >> they become more horrible still. >> >> Did I miss anything major? Probably. If so, please remind me. >> >> Cheers >> William >> >> >> [0] http://blog.labix.org/2011/10/09/death-of-goroutines-under-control >> [1] launchpad.net/tomb (apparently... we really ought to be using v2, >> though) >> [2] https://sites.google.com/site/steveyegge2/singleton-considered-stupid >> >> [3] >> http://jalf.dk/blog/2010/03/singletons-solving-problems-you-didnt-know-you-never-had-since-1995/ >> [4] >> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/40373/so-singletons-are-bad-then-what/ >> >> -- >> Juju-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev >> >> > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > >
-- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
