-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2015-06-04 11:41 PM, John Meinel wrote: > Could it just be a lower priority catch-all rule and have the > other rules evaluated first? It does seem useful to have a backstop > against bad behavior when we introduce a new failure method that > didn't get caught.
Actually, a too-generic match means that a more specific one is unlikely to be found, because it won't be listed on our "unknown outcomes" page: http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/unknown-outcome So I would rather just rip out the rule or dramatically reduce its scope. Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVcavQAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hRIoH/0C7ghhQrXR3p8Mvd7aDTWMH HXGQyjAAAbS3L4WyIX2LQLBdsGTjNYRa7oeJ4fPrIVEL8QsBCthiFay0z6SvQD0T PbKsvYLhKphBpOvqjzPVIhMh7pPOvGwBUvH8jeAJp4iPZfUsKz461ebO44N/fyq3 /L9rHntplMuNhOgw4Eu/mYZnP015Cl+Ovvhsw1PXmevWm1o+YVuUtv1v3zBGGvN1 vJT5D3YDDzW0NaKQWwJ8FLkuYxFLUNo46HcCNeJ+aB+FGvuwPjO6N4PlKsWVdHUg D+Z2uNxT13n0ojFsRdNOTXhMPY01sZbfBeVmJFmxlb5+zPqaDRZXVmUPrp3r07U= =MQxa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
