-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I think that makes sense.
I don't think that there was ever much risk to non-cloudsigma users. I assume the reason for flagging it was to let people test it without asserting it was production-quality. But everyone's had plenty of time to test it now. Aaron On 2015-09-02 05:36 AM, John Meinel wrote: > I would think it is something that doesn't interfere with other > providers. Thus if someone is using cloud sigma then they are using > that provider, but otherwise it isn't in the way. So we can just > drop the feature flag without impacting others. > > Thoughts? > > John =:-> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Aaron Bentley > <aaron.bent...@canonical.com <mailto:aaron.bent...@canonical.com>> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I notice that cloudsigma is still behind a feature flag in master, > as of revision-build 3024. So far, it has been feature-flagged in > both 1.24 and 1.25. Is there a plan to promote it to > fully-supported, without the need for a flag? > > Aaron > > -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > <mailto:Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com> Modify settings or unsubscribe > at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV5wCmAAoJEK84cMOcf+9hfgIIAJVSUavYNiJhOI79oV3g9AVI ALG6F4tGCcpuPYFO2UdZAZhm/S+DLh1z5kzPcKFYZwa/BZzaXLBKukCFFw1yz3Go aEFUAWSQqQThVsYTQDzV2R0axtQyNbr2jtZIg3ZvxewTqEvaTMea/L9hiJLSa7V8 t/kfvdcBrPiftm2MfTmicBhSpq2dSKyxRyFaL20EoU5MNlH79lZwJaYyDR8PQEKe MhdIW+S7ssZF8ZWjSvAl5D61twLmAdQj3Cz42D4OoU+Yo+URsD4c1mDo+ii6LBMu QkSqFCFT31QhC/szYasC+F120R4CvC8YijHVotidk8CafoS+3KaE5+fqCEoHkek= =1YDc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
