Tim If you are adding the ability to specify commands as "hidden", we may greatly benefit from specifying commands as "blockable" too....
Sincerely Yours, Anastasia On 24/05/16 14:19, Tim Penhey wrote: > Hi folks, > > More from the "let's fix the output" school of thought. > > One thing that has bugged me about 'juju help commands' was the > repeated mentions of "alias for <blah>". > > I propose that we don't show aliases by default, and allow the user to > task for them. > > Also, the supercommand describe commands method was written before I > knew about the tabular output, so some code could be cleaned up there. > > Proposal: > > juju help commands > - shows the commands that are neither aliases, nor hidden > juju help commands --alias > - shows either just the aliases, or everything including aliases > juju help commands --all > - shows basic commands, aliases and hidden commands. > > I'd like to add the ability to say a command is hidden so it doesn't > show up in the commands list. The purpose for these could be debugging > assisting type functions, like "dump-model" or "debug-controller" (two > commands that don't yet exist). > > Thoughts? > > Tim > -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
