I just implemented that tonight, pending code review. :) On Oct 9, 2013 4:59 PM, "Mark Shuttleworth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We should really allow passing substrate-specific constraints like > instance types. No need for the voodoo in juju :) > > On 09/10/13 20:16, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > > Unfortunately without an ec2 constraint in juju-core around instance type, > the overlap around capabilities within ec2 instance types means exact > specification via generic constraint is inexact. looks like you already > filed a bug on this https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1237568 > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can't seem to figure out the right combination of constraints to get >> an m1.medium. >> >> juju bootstrap --constraints "cpu-cores=2 mem=3.75" >> >> launches c1.mediums and not m1's. >> >> -- >> Jorge Castro >> Canonical Ltd. >> http://juju.ubuntu.com/charm-championship - Share your infrastructure, >> win a prize! >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> > > > > > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
