On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Clint Byrum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also it isn't clear at all what you mean by "I've removed it". Did you > remove inactive-charmers from charmers or did you remove the team > altogether? He removed inactive-charmers from charmers. However in hindsight I think what this really should be is: ~charmers < --- we maintain the charm store, we actively review and are responsible for the charm store submissions. ~non-reviewing-charmers <--- I help maintain the charm store but I don't actively review. We're part of ~charmers and there is stuff I care about in the store that I want to take care of, but not be responsible for the whole thing. ~inactive-charmers <--- NOT a part of ~charmers, inactive but can activate. I am retired so I shouldn't have access to the entire charm store. I've readded the team for now pending discussion on this list on what we should do. -- Jorge Castro Canonical Ltd. http://juju.ubuntu.com/ <http://juju.ubuntu.com/charm-championship> - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
