Do we want the cloud archive to contain non-lts packages? The packages are being installed on machines that act as the client. Most users running clients are not on lts.
We cannot trivially copy packages in a PPA to the Ubuntu cloud archive pocket. We will change the release process to build into a staging PPA first so that we can extra the tools /before/ users can get the clients. After the tools are released, we would copy packages to the stable PPA. Something could copy packages from staging to UCA /after/ the tools are published. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I know we keep ppa:juju/stable in sync with the Ubuntu Cloud Archive (UCA). > > However in the spirit of keeping everything in one place does it make sense > to point people to the UCA archive itself instead? > > MAAS and OpenStack are in there and we put Juju in there to cut down on > confusion on what people need to add, but in the docs we still mention > ppa:juju/stable. > > -- > Jorge Castro > Canonical Ltd. > http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > -- Curtis Hovey Canonical Cloud Development and Operations http://launchpad.net/~sinzui -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
