On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer <gust...@niemeyer.net>wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Kapil Thangavelu > <kapil.thangav...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Just thinking outloud, but In the active-active db scenario, there's an > > available db for the charm to store this info. ie. the charm could keep > some > > bookeeping tables/db instead of using files on disk (a shared key via > peer > > relation used for storing the credentials in db). > > So you share the credentials for the credentials? :-) > > Just share the credentials over the peer relation. Unit 0 creates them. > You can't make that assumption and we really frown upon it in charm reviews. I've seen cases where `juju deploy -n 5 service` results in unit 2 or really unit > 0 being first up. There's also scenarios where there might not actually be a "unit 0" there's no way to safely guarentee a leader right now.
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
