So, when I first started plugins, I was like "WE SHOULD HAVE A WEBSITE, AND IT SHOULD HAVE PLUGINS, AND AWESOME", but then I realized that we don't have that many plugins. In the future, if plugins become a popular thing we can invest some time in making jujuplugins.com and have a plugin installer, etc. For now just collecting them all in one place is a good start.
Thanks, Marco Ceppi On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Joshua Strobl <truthfroml...@gmail.com>wrote: > Would it be feasible and/or benefitial to have some sort of rating > system for the plugins, with those that get the most support being > merged into juju-core (assuming there wouldn't be some upcoming > functionality that would make the plugin no-longer-useful)? I see that > as a great way to improve Juju's core functionality gradually without > having to worry about tackling a possible issue later where plugin X > that could've been merged is now out-of-date. > > On 02/13/2014 11:37 PM, Jorge O. Castro wrote: > > If you didn't know, Juju has support for plugins. So far these have > > been scattered over junk branches and pastebins so we're going to > > organize them so people have one place to find them: > > > > https://github.com/juju/plugins > > > > We're not going to package them (yet) so we can put them in one place > > and see which ones are useful and which ones aren't. If you have a > > Juju plugin you're using and want to share it then please submit it. > > Thanks to Marco Ceppi for organizing this! > > > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju