On Wed Dec 10 2014 at 10:26:48 AM Eric Snow <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had tried the explanation route to no avail. I'll probably work up > a demo for the specific folks I have in mind. I think juju is one of > those things that makes more sense when you see it in action. > > One thought I had is that we could work up a demo-in-a-box. Either > make a VM image available (with local provider in it?) or fix local > provider so that it runs entirely in VMs/containers. For the latter > we could distribute a script that spins up the new local provider to > make it super easy for someone to try juju out locally, AKA > juju-in-a-box. > We have most of this already, we spin vagrant images that have the local provider installed, configured, and bootstrapped on vagrant up > -eric > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
