No - I can browse to the sjson file and there is no 1.22-beta4 entry. It does show up in the .json file though..
Jason On 02/27/2015 12:34 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > Could caching be an issue? > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ryan Beisner > <ryan.beis...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Ditto, also seeing that. >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jason Hobbs <jason.ho...@canonical.com> >> wrote: > ... > Thanks,https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju:devel:tools.sjson >>> >>> or >>> >>> >>> https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.sjson > > >>> >>> (unsure which one gets used). >>> >>> Jason > > The index > https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/index2.json > points devel streams to > > http://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju-devel-tools.json > which does contain 28 1.22-beta4 agents which I can also see at > http://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/devel/ > > Index2 was updated on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 +0000 > and the devel product file on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 +0000 > > ahh. The json was not signed! The signed json is from the previous > release. We will look into this now. I will reply with an update soon. > -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju