On 24/09/15 10:47, Peter Grandi wrote: > The reason BTW why we are considering this is that we are not too > confident in Juju's acquiring "machines" reliabily, and anyhow out > small hardware collection is better managed manually as we don't want > Juju to grab a random available "node" from MAAS but usually a > specific one, for various reasons, and then it is just simpler to hand > it to Juju manually.
Yes, I think this is perfectly reasonable. If you are dealing with essentially a static cluster, then managing it manually is perfectly appropriate. MAAS would be more appropriate in dynamic environments, where: * the things you are deploying are dynamic - growing and shrinking * the cluster itself is growing and evolving Mark -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
