On 17/03/16 22:34, Nate Finch wrote: > Yes, it'll be ignored, and the charm will be deployed normally. > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM Ryan Beisner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is awesome. What will happen if a charm possesses the flag in >> metadata.yaml and is deployed with 1.25.x? Will it gracefully ignore it? >>
I wonder if there is a clean way for us to have Juju 1.x reject the charm very early in the process, giving an error that would essentially amount to the "not understood"? Or if we could have the charm store refuse to serve up the charm to a 1.x Juju client / server? Mark -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
