On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:43 PM Mark Shuttleworth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The guidance is that we want it to be VERY clear to people, when someone > quotes just a status, what they are talking about. There is a very > different situation in progress when a unit state is being described > than the state of the whole application. Imagine a telephone > conversation between two stressed people; you want the word they use, > even without much context, to tell as much as possible to the other > person about what they are dealing with. > > In this case, I don't think there is as much risk of confusion between > the state of the model and the state of the application, as there is > between app and unit. For that reason, I think it's "OK" but not great > to use the same terms for model and application. > Thanks for the feedback. I think I see where this is coming from now, with juju/agent vs. workload status. I'll go ahead with what I've proposed for 2.0.0rc1 (or whatever we're calling it). I doubt there will be any confusion, but we'll have some time to test it out and rework it as necessary. Cheers, Andrew
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
