On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Charles Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks again for the feedback, > > I'm going to cut and push this release of the Etcd charm and issue a follow > up announcement to the list advising pinning/avoiding upgrade if end users > wish to keep non-tls connections.
I am sure you were already planning to, but also suggest to also announce and communicate development on the upstream etcd mailing list in addition to here. -thanks, Antonio > > Cheers! > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:34 AM Jay Wren <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Casey Marshall >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The overhead of a TLS handshake can be minimal, it just depends on the >>> algorithm & key lengths used. This should be configurable in the layer, I >>> think. EC and 2048-bit RSA have reasonable handshake times. >>> >> >> I take it all back. I just had a chat with coworkers who reminded me that >> etcd supports http2 already and that the performance improvements of http2 >> could be very significant. Given that, I thank you greatly for these TLS >> changes and look forward to using them >> -- >> Jay > > -- > Juju Charmer > Canonical Group Ltd. > Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com > Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
