Hi Steve, If you have not installed any of the older packages the commands are simple:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:juju/develsudo apt updatesudo apt install juju As always, please refer to the documentation when it comes to installation instructions: https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/getting-started-general I found the process a little bit more difficult because I have installed every release of the 2.0 beta and it caused problems. I had to purge all the other juju packages before the above commands worked for me. We are interested in your experience with Juju. Please email me or the list if you have any further questions. We also communicate in IRC #juju in chat.freenode.net. - Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Steve Pe <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm newbi what is command to install latest beta version of Juju on > ubuntu? thx > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Rick Harding <rick.hard...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback Jose. Merlijn also brought up a similar note and >> I replied on the main juju list to help explain the current pain window >> we're working through. Rather than copy/paste you can see it here: >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/2016-August/007679.html >> >> Please let me know if you'd like to chat. I understand that it feels very >> awkward right now, but it's part 'by the plan' as far as the plan went, but >> also 'not by the plan' as we'd hoped to have Juju 2.0 GA for folks at this >> time. We're very close now and the feedback from users of 2.0 has been >> essential to getting so much right and better for everyone. >> >> Jose, let me know if you want to reach out and chat about the transition >> and why things are setup they way they are. We really appreciate the >> feedback and patience as we go through the 1.X to 2.X transition. >> >> Rick >> >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM José Antonio Rey <j...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Matt, >>> >>> Thanks for the link. >>> >>> If anyone reading has a way to help get it fixed, please do so. This is >>> a horrible bug that causes inconsistencies, and until 2.0 is released it >>> should not be in main. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, 09:22 Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello José, >>>> >>>> I ran into this problem myself and filed a bug with the packaging. >>>> >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-release-tools/+bug/1609437 >>>> >>>> While I still think this is a bug, I did find a work around which I put >>>> in the bug for other people having this same problem. Hope that helps! >>>> >>>> - Matt Bruzek <matthew.bru...@canonical.com> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM, José Antonio Rey <j...@ubuntu.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I am deploying some production servers and am seeing a weird behavior: >>>>> >>>>> 2.0~beta12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 is the default for the 'main' repositories >>>>> of archive.ubuntu.com >>>>> >>>>> 1.25.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1~juju1 is the default for ppa:juju/stable >>>>> >>>>> Is this intended? Doesn't feel right to me. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for the insight! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Juju mailing list >>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm >>>>> an/listinfo/juju >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> Juju mailing list >>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm >>> an/listinfo/juju >>> >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm >> an/listinfo/juju >> >> > > > -- > Best wishes; > > Steve Pe > ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevepe ) > > "Doing good to others is not a duty, it is a joy, for it increases our own > health and happiness." > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
