As far as I know, there is no notion of a stable Layer or a stable Interface. That makes it difficult to carry any layered charm as "stable," and quite awkward to cherry-pick and backport fixes to stable charms which depend on Layers and Interfaces.
As you mention, you could synthesize stability (or point-in-time) by branching, forking repos, but I think Layers and Interfaces should ultimately grow proper versioning semantics. Cheers, Ryan On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Konstantinos Tsakalozos < kos.tsakalo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is probably a question on best practises. > > A reasonable ask for a build process is to be able to reproduce the same > output artifacts from a certain point in time. For example, I would like to > be able to rebuild the same charm I build 10 minutes, or a week or a month > ago. I can think of a way to do that but it involves forking the layers > used and getting them locally before charm build. Is there a better way? > What would you do to accommodate this requirement? > > Thanks, > Konstantinos > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
