Fantastic! I checked the docs but i didn't find that using different name could allow multiple instances
I will test asap to check if i can deal with it. Thank you! Patrizio Il giorno ven 21 apr 2017 alle 16:24 Dmitrii Shcherbakov < [email protected]> ha scritto: > Patrizio, > > In a bundle: > > nova-compute-kvm: > charm: cs:xenial/nova-compute > ... > options: > ... > virt-type: kvm > nova-compute-lxd: > charm: cs:xenial/nova-compute > ... > options: > ... > virt-type: lxd > > > Best Regards, > Dmitrii Shcherbakov > > Field Software Engineer > IRC (freenode): Dmitrii-Sh > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Patrizio Bassi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear All >> >> this conversation led me to an interesting (for me at least!) speculation >> about nova-compute charm. >> >> At the moment the nova-compute charm has "virt-type" param supporting >> kvm, xen, uml, lxc, qemu, lxd. >> At the same time we have nova-compute-vmware charm which is an >> indipendent app. >> >> So, in case i may want to have an openstack with kvm and vmware mixed, >> juju allows it (just talking about juju, not considering openstack >> opportunity to have them really working). >> >> What if i want to have two nova-compute installations, one unit with kvm >> and one with lxd? As far i know we cannot. >> So it would be nice to add a feature such as: >> >> juju deploy <app> which defaults the deployed app to charm name >> juju deploy <app> -name <mycustomname> >> >> so all units will be in mycustomname/00XXX format, we kee the original >> charm reference (for upgrades for instance) and we can use multiple >> configurations under a different "umbrella" >> >> ie. >> nova-compute/0 (with default kvm) >> nova-compute/1 (with default kvm) >> nova-compute/2 (with default kvm) >> mynova-compute/0 (with lxd) >> mynova-compute/1 (with lxd) >> mynova-compute/2 (with lxd) >> >> regards, >> Patrizio >> >> >> 2017-04-21 9:55 GMT+02:00 Mark Shuttleworth <[email protected]>: >> >>> On 20/04/17 13:36, fengxia wrote: >>> > >>> > I c. So I should have used add-unit command instead of "deploy". Is >>> > that right? >>> > >>> >>> Yup :) >>> >>> -- >>> Juju mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Patrizio Bassi >> www.patriziobassi.it >> http://piazzadelpopolo.patriziobassi.it >> >> -- >> Juju mailing list >> [email protected] >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >> >> > -- Patrizio Bassi www.patriziobassi.it http://piazzadelpopolo.patriziobassi.it
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
