I found this quick comparison between Openshift and Kubernetes:
https://medium.com/levvel-consulting/the-differences-between-kubernetes-and-openshift-ae778059a90e
<https://medium.com/levvel-consulting/the-differences-between-kubernetes-and-openshift-ae778059a90e>
It points out that OpenShift adds routes, projects and configuration.
Projects provide authentication and resource management, that seems what you
already get with O~S projects.
Then there is Deployment Configuration:
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/dev_guide/deployments/how_deployments_work.html
<https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.3/dev_guide/deployments/how_deployments_work.html>
that looks quite similar to what Juju does.
Then the question is: can Juju deal with configuration of Kubernetes pods?
—
> On 27 giu 2017, at 10:31, Ante Karamatić <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Giuseppe
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:32 AM Giuseppe Attardi <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Some Italian public administration are considering purchasing cloud services
> for Big Data analytics deployed on Openshift.
> How this solution would compare with using a Kubernetes cluster deployed
> through Juju?
> More in general, what is the strategic outlook of container platforms vs
> virtualization platforms?
> Are the former ones going to overcome the latter?
>
> There is never a solution that fits all. Some will prefer cloud, some will
> like application containers, some will prefer machine containers. We are
> already in container world, while the cloud is still around. And obviously,
> bare metal machines are still here. So is VMware.
>
> In the end, one should not limit its own business to one specific
> infrastructure technology. In fact, one should look to be as flexible as
> possible with infrastructure. Obviously, there is a lot of cost in
> maintaining flexible anything.
>
> The way it looks today, Kubernetes is currently shaping up to be the the
> leader in docker orchestration. But, who knows what future brings, right?
>
> With juju there is one thing you can be sure of - whatever future brings,
> juju will be there, capable of connecting different infrastructure solutions.
> I know it sounds questionable coming from a Canonical employee, but It really
> is a unique strength. Being able to preserve operations knowledge and people
> while the world is rapidly changing around you is very cost effective.
> --
> Ante Karamatić
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Canonical
--
Juju mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju