Hi, Thank you Menno, John and James. Very helpful feedbacks :)
I will try and keep you posted. Thanks Naz On Jul 6, 2017 10:25 AM, James Hebden <[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:13:04AM +0400, John Meinel wrote: > I don't know if there are advantages to squid-deb-proxy vs apt-cacher-ng, I > just found that "apt install apt-cacher-ng" and then setting the cloud > config was sufficient. (apt-cacher-ng also puts up a web page at a specific > port so you can see if the cache is getting used and what the hit/miss rate > is.) > > John > =:-> I've had issues with accessing PPAs using squid-deb-proxy due to the default policies it configures - so it's good to be aware of that, lest you spend a lot of time debugging a specific PPA only to find out it's squid causing the issues. I haven't compared against apt-cache-ng, however if you're not seeing issues with PPAs, that would be a fairly conclusive test :) James > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- James Hebden Cloud Reliability Engineer BootStack Squad @ Canonical Ltd.
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
