Are there any plans to let users assess the "quality" of a charm in a different way? Like showing the amount of (successful) deploys or smth?
On Aug 4, 2017 16:21, "Tim Van Steenburgh" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I wanted to send a note about some changes in the way we handle charm > reviews and the top-level namespace of the charm store. We’ve taken a look > at what’s happened in the past and where we want to get to and decided that > a much more lightweight process is the way forward. > > The biggest change is actually the sunsetting of the charm review queue. > The reality is the process as it stands cannot keep up with the demand for > reviews. We’ve decided to take a community curation approach. > > A charm review is no longer a prerequisite for promulgation to the > top-level namespace of the charm store. If you would like your charm > promulgated, and the name is available, you may simply request promulgation > on this mailing list. A member of the ~charmers Launchpad group will then: > > > 1. > > Download your charm using `charm pull` > 2. > > Run `charm proof` on your charm > 3. > > Ensure you have `charm set` a bugs-url and homepage > 4. > > If 2 or 3 fails, the charmer will request an update to the charm > 5. > > `charm promulgate` the charm (or request that #2-3 be fixed) > 6. > > `charm grant` you write access on the promulgated charm > > > Some things to keep in mind as a charm author: > > > 1. > > It is your responsibility as the charm author and maintainer to test > your charm and ensure its quality and security. > 2. > > Promulgation to the top level does not imply endorsement by Canonical. > 3. > > Charm authors are encouraged to use their personal or group namespace. > Although promulgation is still available, there is nothing wrong with using > personal and group namespaces. > > > For those seeking assistance with charm development, members of ~charmers > and other proficient charm developers are available in #juju on Freenode > IRC and on this mailing list. Discontinuing the formal charm review process > does not in any way decrease the availability of or access to these > resources. If you need help, just ask! > > In the coming weeks, the docs at jujucharms.com will be updated to > reflect these changes. The review queue (review.jujucharms.com) will be > shut down, and all open reviews will be closed with a comment/email linking > to this explanatory post. Anyone with an open review that still desires > promulgation can request it with an email to this list. > > If you have any questions or concerns, please reply to this post! > > Thanks, > > Tim Van Steenburgh > > > -- > Juju mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
