Well if using MAAS would be easier, I'm happy to do that. I actually just hadn't considered it a possibility, but I see at https://askubuntu.com/questions/870624/configuring-maas-with-vmware-esxi-nodes-and-virsh that it may be :)
I wonder what would be the difference in range of charms that I can actually use if I use MAAS vs directly use juju vsphere support. -serge Quoting [email protected] ([email protected]): > Hi > > Thats typical me. I implied that you use maas and have trouble > setting it up with juju as a cloud. Pardon me. Thats how i work ;-) > > BR > > > > Christian > > Quoting "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>: > > >Quoting [email protected] > >([email protected]): > >>Hi > >> > >>6.0 should work. It does for me and even 6.5. > > > >Ok - like I say I only have the one 6.0 so not ideal, but a starting > >point. > > > >>I already have offered the devs that they can use my environment to > >>sort out all the open bugs. But so far nobody was willing to do so. > > > >... > > > >>What i did maybe helpful do you... > >> > >>#!/bin/bash > >>maas -<user> machines add-chassis chassis_type='vmware' > >>username='<domain>\<user>' password='<password>' > >>protocol='https+unverified' hostname=<hostname of you vcenter> > >>prefix_filter=<your host prefix> domain=<domain> > > > >Pardon my ignorance - but I don't know what I'm looking at :) Do > >you run that on the juju server then target juju at that maas > >instance? > > > >>Without the https+unverified i couldnt get it to work adding a > >>chassis because in the GUI the protocol field is missing. > >> > >>BR > >> > >>Christian > > > >thanks,-serge > pub 2048R/DF0339A2 2017-09-10 Christian Setzer > <[email protected]> > sub 2048R/68E412B2 2017-09-10 -- Juju mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
